Construct validity of the Infant Motor Profile: relation with prenatal, perinatal, and neonatal risk factors

Kirsten R. Heineman, Sacha la Bastide-van Gemert, Vaclav Fidler, Karin J. Middelburg, Arend F. Bos, Mijna Hadders-Algra*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AIM The Infant Motor Profile (IMP) is a qualitative assessment of motor behaviour of infants aged 3 to 18 months. The aim of this study was to investigate construct validity of the IMP through the relation of IMP scores with prenatal, perinatal, and neonatal variables, including the presence of brain pathology indicated by neonatal ultrasound imaging of the brain.

METHOD A longitudinal prospective study was performed in a group of 30 term infants (12 females, 18 males; median gestational age 40.1wks, range 37.6-42wks) and 59 preterm infants (25 females, 34 males; median gestational age 29.7wks, range 25-34.7wks). IMP assessments were performed at (corrected) ages of 4, 6, 10, 12, and 18 months. Socio-economic and perinatal data were collected, which, in the case of preterm infants, included information on periventricular leukomalacia and intraventricular haemorrhage based on neonatal cranial ultrasound. Data were analysed by fitting mixed-effects models.

RESULTS Gestational age, socio-economic status, and 5-minute Apgar scores were significant determinants of IMP scores in the total group of infants (p

INTERPRETATION The findings support the construct validity of the IMP: IMP scores are clearly associated with relevant determinants of neuromotor function.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E209-E215
Number of pages7
JournalDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology
Volume52
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept-2010

Keywords

  • LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT
  • GROUP SELECTION THEORY
  • PRETERM INFANTS
  • AGE
  • DISABILITY
  • ULTRASOUND
  • CHILDREN
  • COHORT
  • CARE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Construct validity of the Infant Motor Profile: relation with prenatal, perinatal, and neonatal risk factors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this