TY - JOUR
T1 - Constructing ecological security patterns with differentiated management intensity based on multifunctional landscape identification and multi-criteria decision-making
AU - Jiang, Hong
AU - Peng, Jian
AU - Xu, Dongmei
AU - Tang, Hui
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - The trade-off of ecosystem services should be considered in ecological security pattern (ESP) construction, which can be reflected in landscape multifunctionality and comprehensive importance. Multi-intensity ESPs management is also required to achieve effective ecological planning. In this study, we proposed an approach of multi-intensity ESPs construction that integrated multifunctional landscape identification and multi-criteria decision-making into ecological source identification, and categorized ecological sources based on the “trend-status-risk” framework, with a case study in the city belt along the Yellow River in Ningxia. The results showed that the optimal weights of the four ecosystem services of habitat maintenance, water conservation, carbon sequestration and soil retention based on multi-criteria decision making were 0.5000, 0.2071, 0.1589 and 0.1340, respectively. The trade-off degree of the ecosystem services was 0.6612, and the overall conservation efficiency was 1.5212. Conservation priority areas based on multifunctional landscape identification and multi-criteria decision-making had an overlapping area of 2189.38 km2, accounting for 84.86% of that identified through landscape multifunctionality. The comprehensive ESP of the study area included 45 ecological sources covering a total area of 6067.14 km2 and 91 ecological corridors with a total area of 3331.62 km2. Multi-intensity ESPs aiming at conservation, prevention, restoration and reconstruction were established with corresponding management suggestions. The approach to constructing multi-intensity ESPs proposed in this study has application potential in ecological planning of ecologically vulnerable regions, facilitating differentiated ESP management.
AB - The trade-off of ecosystem services should be considered in ecological security pattern (ESP) construction, which can be reflected in landscape multifunctionality and comprehensive importance. Multi-intensity ESPs management is also required to achieve effective ecological planning. In this study, we proposed an approach of multi-intensity ESPs construction that integrated multifunctional landscape identification and multi-criteria decision-making into ecological source identification, and categorized ecological sources based on the “trend-status-risk” framework, with a case study in the city belt along the Yellow River in Ningxia. The results showed that the optimal weights of the four ecosystem services of habitat maintenance, water conservation, carbon sequestration and soil retention based on multi-criteria decision making were 0.5000, 0.2071, 0.1589 and 0.1340, respectively. The trade-off degree of the ecosystem services was 0.6612, and the overall conservation efficiency was 1.5212. Conservation priority areas based on multifunctional landscape identification and multi-criteria decision-making had an overlapping area of 2189.38 km2, accounting for 84.86% of that identified through landscape multifunctionality. The comprehensive ESP of the study area included 45 ecological sources covering a total area of 6067.14 km2 and 91 ecological corridors with a total area of 3331.62 km2. Multi-intensity ESPs aiming at conservation, prevention, restoration and reconstruction were established with corresponding management suggestions. The approach to constructing multi-intensity ESPs proposed in this study has application potential in ecological planning of ecologically vulnerable regions, facilitating differentiated ESP management.
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Hot spot analysis
KW - Multi-intensity ecological security patterns
KW - Multifunctional landscape
KW - Trade-off decision-making
KW - Trend-status-risk framework
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85188205274
U2 - 10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e02862
DO - 10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e02862
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85188205274
SN - 2351-9894
VL - 50
JO - Global Ecology and Conservation
JF - Global Ecology and Conservation
M1 - e02862
ER -