TY - JOUR
T1 - Contesting the Mainstream
T2 - Towards an Audience-Centered Agenda of Alternative News Research
AU - Frischlich, Lena
AU - Eldridge II, Scott A
AU - Figenschou, Tine Ustad
AU - Ihlebæk, Karoline Andrea
AU - Holt, Kristoffer
AU - Cushion, Stephen
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - In order to better understand alternative news media, we need to focus more centrally on the audiences that regularly consume them. This special issue, entitled “Contesting the Mainstream: Understanding Alternative News Media,” advances such an audience turn. In the introduction, we outline how scholars have understood and characterized alternative news audiences. These have ranged from seeing them as (i) ideal participants and activists; as (ii) being misinformed and manipulated; and as (iii) being critical users. Drawing on studies published in this special issue, we highlight how these studies provide new and revealing empirical insights that advance all three perspectives. Taken together, the articles make a strong argument to move beyond binary ideations of normatively “good” or “bad” alternative news audiences. In our view, they signal the need to better understand the complexity behind audience engagement not just with alternative news media but mainstream journalism more generally. Based on this argument, we identify several starting points for moving the field forward with such an audience turn in mind.
AB - In order to better understand alternative news media, we need to focus more centrally on the audiences that regularly consume them. This special issue, entitled “Contesting the Mainstream: Understanding Alternative News Media,” advances such an audience turn. In the introduction, we outline how scholars have understood and characterized alternative news audiences. These have ranged from seeing them as (i) ideal participants and activists; as (ii) being misinformed and manipulated; and as (iii) being critical users. Drawing on studies published in this special issue, we highlight how these studies provide new and revealing empirical insights that advance all three perspectives. Taken together, the articles make a strong argument to move beyond binary ideations of normatively “good” or “bad” alternative news audiences. In our view, they signal the need to better understand the complexity behind audience engagement not just with alternative news media but mainstream journalism more generally. Based on this argument, we identify several starting points for moving the field forward with such an audience turn in mind.
U2 - 10.1080/21670811.2023.2214791
DO - 10.1080/21670811.2023.2214791
M3 - Article
SN - 2167-0811
VL - 11
SP - 727
EP - 740
JO - Digital Journalism
JF - Digital Journalism
IS - 5
ER -