Controversies in Choledochal Malformations: A Survey among Dutch Pediatric Surgeons

Maria Hendrina Antoinette van den Eijnden, Ruben H. de Kleine, Henkjan J. Verkade, Jim C. H. Wilde, Paul M. J. G. Peeters, Jan B. F. Hulscher*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background Choledochalmalformation (CM) is a rare medical condition of which 80% are diagnosed in pediatric patients. There are several important controversies regarding diagnostic workup, management, and follow-up in these pediatric patients. To assess preferences and practices of Dutch pediatric surgeons regarding the diagnostic procedures, management, and follow-up of children with CM we conducted an electronic survey.

    Methods A questionnaire was sent to all the pediatric surgeons working in the academic centers and the only community hospital with a pediatric surgery service. The questionnaire included, items regarding incidence, diagnostic workup, interval between diagnosis and surgery, surgical techniques, and follow-up. We also assessed whether personal exposure influenced the preferences and practices.

    Results Overall 22 out of the 31 (71%) Dutch pediatric surgeons returned the questionnaire. Total 15 out of 22 (68%) encountered CM up to 2 times/y, whereas 7 out of 22 (32%) encountered it more than 2 times/y. Indications for surgery were significantly different between surgeons who encountered CM > 2 time/y versus those who did not: 6/6 (100%) of surgeons encountering CM > 2 times/y considered the presence of an asymptomatic CM an indication for surgery versus 5/14 (36%) of the pediatric surgeons who encountered a CM up to 2 times/y (p = 0.01). Overall 12 out of the 22 (55%) respondents preferred surgery between 6 months and 2 years of age. The amount of exposure did not differ in preferred age at surgery or surgical technique. In the symptomatic child 10/22 (45%) of respondents preferred surgery within 3 months. Overall 7/22 (32%) favored laparoscopic resection. Hepaticojejunostomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction was the preferred reconstruction for all the respondents. One-third stated that they never performed a parenchyma resection. Follow-up was limited to 10 years in almost half of the respondents.

    Conclusion Dutch pediatric surgeons demonstrate a wide variety of opinions regarding diagnostic workup, treatment, and follow-up of CM. Whilemost surgeons encounter CM up to 2 times/y, there is an association between exposure and several of the outcome parameters. Some of the answers are not in line with the expert opinion. This demonstrates that there is a need for evidence-based (inter)national guidelines regarding the diagnostic approach, management, and follow-up.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)441-448
    Number of pages8
    JournalEuropean Journal of Pediatric Surgery
    Volume25
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct-2015

    Keywords

    • choledochal malformation
    • choledochal cysts
    • controversies in choledochal malformation
    • malformation
    • MAGNETIC-RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY
    • ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY
    • MR CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY
    • LONG-TERM
    • FOLLOW-UP
    • INTRAOPERATIVE ENDOSCOPY
    • LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION
    • CYSTS
    • CHILDREN
    • MANAGEMENT

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Controversies in Choledochal Malformations: A Survey among Dutch Pediatric Surgeons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this