Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions compared to open-breast biopsy

J. H. Groenewoud*, R. M. Pijnappel, M. E. Van Den Akker-Van Marle, E. Birnie, T. Buijs-Van Der Woude, W. P.Th M. Mali, H. J. De Koning, E. Buskens

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that the introduction of large-core needle biopsy (LCNB) replacing needle-localised breast biopsy (NLBB) for nonpalpable (screen-detected) breast lesions could result in substantial cost savings at the expense of a possible slight increase in breast cancer mortality. The cost-effectiveness of LCNB and NLBB was estimated using a microsimulation model. The sensitivity of LCNB (0.97) and resource use and costs of LCNB and NLBB were derived from a multicentre consecutive cohort study among 973 women who consented in getting LCNB and NLBB, if LCNB was negative. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Replacing NLBB with LCNB would result in approximately six more breast cancer deaths per year (in a target population of 2.1 million women), or in 1000 extra life-years lost from breast cancer (effect over 100 years). The total costs of management of breast cancer (3% discounted) are estimated at £4676 million with NLBB; introducing LCNB would save £13 million. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of continued NLBB vs LCNB would be £12 482 per additional life-year gained (3% discounted); incremental costs range from £-21 687 (low threshold for breast biopsy) to £74 378 (high sensitivity of LCNB).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)383-392
Number of pages10
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume90
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26-Jan-2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Biopsies
  • Breast radiography
  • Cancer screening
  • Cost-effectiveness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions compared to open-breast biopsy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this