Couple-based expanded carrier screening provided by general practitioners to couples in the Dutch general population: psychological outcomes and reproductive intentions

Erwin Birnie*, Juliette Schuurmans, Mirjam Plantinga, Kristin M Abbott, Angela Fenwick, Anneke Lucassen, Marjolein Y Berger, Irene M van Langen, Adelita V Ranchor

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of expanded preconception carrier screening (ECS) is to inform any couple wishing to conceive about their chances of having children with severe autosomal or X-linked recessive conditions. Responsible implementation of ECS as reproductive genetic screening in routine care requires assessment of benefits and harms. We examined the psychological outcomes of couple-based ECS for 50 autosomal recessive (AR) conditions provided by general practitioners (GPs) to couples from the Dutch general population.

METHODS: Dutch GPs invited 4,295 women aged 18-40. We examined anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI-6), worry, decisional conflict (DCS) over time in participants declining GP counseling or attending GP counseling with/without testing.

RESULTS: One hundred ninety couples participated; 130 attended counseling, of whom 117 proceeded with testing. No carrier couples were identified. Before counseling, worry (median 6.0) and anxiety (mean 30-34) were low and lower than the population reference (36.4), although some individuals reported increased anxiety or worry. At follow-up, test acceptors reported less anxiety than test decliners (mean 29 vs. 35); differences in anxiety after testing compared to before counseling were not meaningful. Most participants (90%) were satisfied with their decision (not) to undergo testing.

CONCLUSION: Some individuals reported temporarily clinically relevant distress. Overall, the psychological outcomes are acceptable and no barrier to population-wide implementation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1761-1768
Number of pages8
JournalGenetics in Medicine
Volume23
Issue number9
Early online date10-Jun-2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept-2021

Keywords

  • INFORMED DECISION-MAKING
  • CYSTIC-FIBROSIS
  • VALIDATION
  • SCALE

Cite this