Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademic

Abstract

The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationArgumentation and Inference
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation
EditorsSteve Oswald, Didier Maillat
PublisherCollege Publications
Chapter60
Pages887-907
Number of pages21
Volume2
ISBN (Print)978-1-84890-264-8
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Event2nd European Conference on Argumentation - Fribourg, Switzerland
Duration: 20-Jun-201723-Jun-2017
http://ecargument.org/?page_id=730

Publication series

NameStudies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation
PublisherCollege Publications
Volume77

Conference

Conference2nd European Conference on Argumentation
Abbreviated titleECA 2017
CountrySwitzerland
CityFribourg
Period20/06/201723/06/2017
Internet address

Keywords

  • argument schemes, compromise, criticisms, Paris Agreement, profile of dialogue, stock issues

Cite this