Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises

Jan Albert van Laar; Erik C. W. Krabbe

Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic

Abstract

The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Argumentation and Inference
Subtitle of host publication	Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation
Editors	Steve Oswald, Didier Maillat
Publisher	College Publications
Chapter	60
Pages	887-907
Number of pages	21
Volume	2
ISBN (Print)	978-1-84890-264-8
Publication status	Published - 2018
Event	2nd European Conference on Argumentation - Fribourg, Switzerland Duration: 20-Jun-2017 → 23-Jun-2017 http://ecargument.org/?page_id=730

Publication series

Name	Studies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation
Publisher	College Publications
Volume	77

Conference

Conference	2nd European Conference on Argumentation
Abbreviated title	ECA 2017
Country	Switzerland
City	Fribourg
Period	20/06/2017 → 23/06/2017
Internet address	http://ecargument.org/?page_id=730

Keywords

argument schemes, compromise, criticisms, Paris Agreement, profile of dialogue, stock issues

Cite this

@inproceedings{e3cf6f3e731b44b8a92476afaac2514f,

title = "Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises",

abstract = "The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict. ",

keywords = "argument schemes, compromise, criticisms, Paris Agreement, profile of dialogue, stock issues",

author = "{van Laar}, {Jan Albert} and Krabbe, {Erik C. W.}",

year = "2018",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1-84890-264-8",

volume = "2",

series = "Studies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation",

publisher = "College Publications",

pages = "887--907",

editor = "Steve Oswald and Didier Maillat",

booktitle = "Argumentation and Inference",

note = "2nd European Conference on Argumentation, ECA 2017 ; Conference date: 20-06-2017 Through 23-06-2017",

url = "http://ecargument.org/?page_id=730",

}

van Laar, JA & Krabbe, ECW 2018, Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises. in S Oswald & D Maillat (eds), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation. vol. 2, Studies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation, vol. 77, College Publications, pp. 887-907, 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg, Switzerland, 20/06/2017.

Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises. / van Laar, Jan Albert ; Krabbe, Erik C. W.

Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation. ed. / Steve Oswald; Didier Maillat. Vol. 2 College Publications, 2018. p. 887-907 (Studies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation; Vol. 77).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic

TY - GEN

T1 - Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises

AU - van Laar, Jan Albert

AU - Krabbe, Erik C. W.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.

AB - The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.

KW - argument schemes, compromise, criticisms, Paris Agreement, profile of dialogue, stock issues

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-1-84890-264-8

VL - 2

T3 - Studies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation

SP - 887

EP - 907

BT - Argumentation and Inference

A2 - Oswald, Steve

A2 - Maillat, Didier

PB - College Publications

T2 - 2nd European Conference on Argumentation

Y2 - 20 June 2017 through 23 June 2017

ER -