Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises: The 2015 Paris Agreement in Dutch Parliament

Jan Albert van Laar; Erik C. W. Krabbe

doi:10.1075/jaic.18009.laa

Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises: The 2015 Paris Agreement in Dutch Parliament

Jan Albert van Laar, Erik C. W. Krabbe

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

89 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	91-111
Number of pages	21
Journal	Journal of Argumentation in Context
Volume	8
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18009.laa
Publication status	Published - 14-Feb-2019

Keywords

argument schemes, compromise, criticisms, Paris Agreement, profile of dialogue, stock issues

Access to Document

10.1075/jaic.18009.laa

Criticism and justification of negotiated compromises Final publisher's version, 835 KBLicence: Taverne

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{87482d47fac44def81dadc71f9a6e0c9,

title = "Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises: The 2015 Paris Agreement in Dutch Parliament",

abstract = "The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.",

keywords = "argument schemes, compromise, criticisms, Paris Agreement, profile of dialogue, stock issues",

author = "{van Laar}, {Jan Albert} and Krabbe, {Erik C. W.}",

note = "Reworked version of our contribution on the same topic in the ECA 2017 proceedings.",

year = "2019",

month = feb,

day = "14",

doi = "10.1075/jaic.18009.laa",

language = "English",

volume = "8",

pages = "91--111",

journal = "Journal of Argumentation in Context",

issn = "2211-4742",

publisher = "John Benjamins Publishers",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises

T2 - The 2015 Paris Agreement in Dutch Parliament

AU - van Laar, Jan Albert

AU - Krabbe, Erik C. W.

N1 - Reworked version of our contribution on the same topic in the ECA 2017 proceedings.

PY - 2019/2/14

Y1 - 2019/2/14

N2 - The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.

AB - The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.

KW - argument schemes, compromise, criticisms, Paris Agreement, profile of dialogue, stock issues

U2 - 10.1075/jaic.18009.laa

DO - 10.1075/jaic.18009.laa

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 91

EP - 111

JO - Journal of Argumentation in Context

JF - Journal of Argumentation in Context

SN - 2211-4742

IS - 1

ER -