Crossing ethnic boundaries? A social network investigation of defending relationships in schools

Marianne Hooijsma*, Dorottya Kisfalusi, Gijs Huitsing, Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, Andreas Flache, René Veenstra

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)
    62 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Prosocial peer relationships, such as defending against victimization, are beneficial for integration. Using the concept of multiple categorization, this study considers the extent to which similarity in gender, being in the same classroom, and similarity in network position regarding bullying or victimization contributes to the formation of cross-ethnic defending relationships among children. Longitudinal social network models were applied to complete school-level networks of 1,325 children in eight multi-ethnic elementary schools. Although same-ethnic peers were more likely to defend each other than cross-ethnic peers, similarity in gender, being in the same classroom, and similarity in network position in bullying fostered cross-ethnic defending. Moreover, being in the same classroom increased the likelihood of cross-ethnic defending even more than it did same-ethnic defending. A better understanding of how multiple categorization contributes to positive relationships between peers of different ethnic backgrounds may help to promote interethnic integration in multi-ethnic classrooms.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1391-1408
    Number of pages18
    JournalGroup Processes and Intergroup Relations
    Volume24
    Issue number8
    Early online date6-Jul-2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1-Dec-2021

    Keywords

    • bullying
    • defending
    • ethnicity
    • RSiena
    • social networks

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Crossing ethnic boundaries? A social network investigation of defending relationships in schools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this