Cubital tunnel syndrome: A comparison of an endoscopic technique with a minimal invasive open technique

M. A. J. Bolster*, O. T. Zophel, E. R. van den Heuvel, M. Ruettermann

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    41 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Both open and endoscopic methods for ulnar nerve decompression have been described. The purpose of this study is to compare the 6-month results of a minimal invasive open technique with an endoscopic technique. We treated 60 patients with unilateral ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, employing both techniques. Six months postoperative we found no differences in treatment effect on pain and disability scores between both groups, but both techniques resulted in an early postoperative relief of symptoms and good patient satisfaction.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)621-625
    Number of pages5
    JournalJournal of Hand Surgery (European volume)
    Volume39
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul-2014

    Keywords

    • Cubital tunnel syndrome
    • ulnar nerve decompression
    • endoscopic
    • minimal invasive
    • ULNAR NERVE ENTRAPMENT
    • ELBOW
    • DECOMPRESSION
    • RELEASE
    • TRANSPOSITION
    • ASSISTANCE
    • MANAGEMENT

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cubital tunnel syndrome: A comparison of an endoscopic technique with a minimal invasive open technique'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this