Dangerous Narratives: How Fake News and Narrative Journalism Shed Light on Journalism’s Epistemological Foundations and Self-understanding in the Twenty-first Century

Frank Harbers*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Journalism is struggling to maintain its commercial viability as well as its authority as a trustworthy institution that offers a reliable representation of what is going on in the world. The objectivity ideal, prevalent during a large part of the twentieth century, is no longer considered the obvious professional practice. Alternatives are being formulated, by startups and new entrants to the field, in which the subjective nature of reporting as a form of storytelling is acknowledged and sometimes even embraced as the solution for the ‘crisis’ journalism is currently in. At the same time, journalism is struggling with the growing threat of fake news, and the current debates about ‘post-truth’ are seen as exemplifying the state of our information society. This chapter will discuss the current concern and discussion about fake news and post-truth, and connect it to the growing prominence of narrative forms of journalism and the embrace of the subjectivity of the reporter. The fundamental question that underlies these issues is if and how journalism can remain society’s ‘primary sense-making practice’ in the twenty-first century?
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNarrative Values, the Value of Narratives
EditorsSjoerd-Jeroen Moenandar, Barend van Heusden
PublisherDe Gruyter
Pages155-180
Number of pages26
ISBN (Electronic)9783111440804
ISBN (Print)9783111440286
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul-2024

Publication series

NameNarratologia
PublisherDe Gruyter
Volume91
ISSN (Print)1612-8427

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dangerous Narratives: How Fake News and Narrative Journalism Shed Light on Journalism’s Epistemological Foundations and Self-understanding in the Twenty-first Century'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this