Abstract
Hindriks argued that Searle’s theory of institutions suffers from a number
of problems pertaining to the notions of constitutive rule, status function,
Status Function Declaration, deontic power, and human right. Lobo argues
that these criticisms are not sufficiently charitable. In response, it is argued
here that the problems that were identified earlier are sufficiently severe to
call for substantial revisions of the theory.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 363–369 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Philosophy of the Social Sciences |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |