Delay in the administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection: A prospective multicenter hospital-based cohort study

  • A. J. Kaasch*
  • , S. Rieg
  • , J. Kuetscher
  • , H. -R. Brodt
  • , T. Widmann
  • , M. Herrmann
  • , C. Meyer
  • , T. Welte
  • , P. Kern
  • , U. Haars
  • , S. Reuter
  • , I. Huebner
  • , R. Strauss
  • , B. Sinha
  • , F. M. Brunkhorst
  • , M. Hellmich
  • , G. Faetkenheuer
  • , W. V. Kern
  • , H. Seifert
  • , preSABATO Study Grp
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Early broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatment reduces mortality in patients with septic shock. In a multicenter, prospective observational study, we explored whether delayed appropriate antimicrobial therapy (AAT) influences outcome in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB).

Two hundred and fifty-six patients with SAB from ten German study centers were enrolled and followed for 3 months. Predisposing factors, clinical features, diagnostic procedures, antimicrobial therapy, and outcome were recorded. The appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy was judged by a trained physician based on in vitro activity, dosage, and duration of therapy. Therapy was considered to be delayed when more than 24 h elapsed between the first positive blood culture and the start of appropriate therapy. The association of delayed therapy with overall mortality and SAB-related events (i.e., attributable mortality or late SAB-related complications) was assessed by crosstabulation and propensity score-based logistic regression.

One hundred and sixty-eight patients received AAT during their hospital stay, of whom 42 (25 %) received delayed AAT. The overall mortality and the occurrence of severe sepsis or septic shock were lower in patients with delayed AAT, pointing towards confounding by indication. Adjusted 90-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.91, 95 % confidence interval [CI] [0.39-2.13], p 0.82) and SAB-related events (adjusted OR 1.46, 95 % CI [0.47-4.51], p 0.52) also failed to show a significant impact of delayed AAT on outcome.

In patients with SAB, early AAT may not improve survival. However, confounding by indication is a major challenge when analyzing and interpreting observational studies on the impact of delayed AAT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)979-985
Number of pages7
JournalInfection
Volume41
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct-2013

Keywords

  • Staphylococcus aureus
  • Bloodstream infection
  • Antimicrobial
  • Antibiotic
  • Adequate
  • Empiric
  • Appropriate
  • EMPIRICAL ANTIBIOTIC-THERAPY
  • PROPENSITY SCORES
  • 30-DAY MORTALITY
  • SEPTIC SHOCK
  • BACTEREMIA
  • IMPACT
  • SEPSIS
  • SURVIVAL
  • PREDICTORS
  • GUIDELINES

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Delay in the administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection: A prospective multicenter hospital-based cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this