Abstract
We study how domestic politics affected the decisions of countries to adhere to the classical gold standard. Using a variety of econometric techniques and controlling for a wide range of economic factors, we demonstrate that political constraints were important in the decision of countries to adopt the gold standard as well as in the decision to suspend it. Specifically we find that the probability of adherence to the gold standard was ceteris paribus lower for countries in which domestic politics were organized in a more open and democratic fashion. This effect appears to be driven largely by the extent of domestic political competition and was particularly relevant for peripheral countries.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publisher | University of Groningen |
Number of pages | 38 |
Publication status | Published - Feb-2018 |
Publication series
Name | GGDC Research Memoranda |
---|---|
Publisher | Groningen Growth and Development Centre |
Volume | GD-175 |
Keywords
- First Globalization Era
- Gold Standard
- Democracy
- Political Competition
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Democratic Constraints and Adherence to the Classical Gold Standard'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Democratic Constraints and Adherence to the Classical Gold Standard (Dataset)
Kramer, B. S. (Contributor) & Milionis, P. (Contributor), ICPSR, 12-Jul-2021
DOI: 10.3886/e156401v2
Dataset