Depth of maximum of air-shower profiles at the Pierre Auger Observatory. II. Composition implications

A. Aab*, P. Abreu, M. Aglietta, E. J. Ahn, I. Al Samarai, I. F. M. Albuquerque, I. Allekotte, S. Buitink, W. Docters, Q. Dorosti Hasankiadeh, S. Messina, R. Meyhandan, O. Scholten, A. M. van den Berg, A. van Vliet, Pierre Auger Collaboration

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    348 Citations (Scopus)
    26 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Using the data taken at the Pierre Auger Observatory between December 2004 and December 2012, we have examined the implications of the distributions of depths of atmospheric shower maximum (X-max), using a hybrid technique, for composition and hadronic interaction models. We do this by fitting the distributions with predictions from a variety of hadronic interaction models for variations in the composition of the primary cosmic rays and examining the quality of the fit. Regardless of what interaction model is assumed, we find that our data are not well described by a mix of protons and iron nuclei over most of the energy range. Acceptable fits can be obtained when intermediate masses are included, and when this is done consistent results for the proton and iron-nuclei contributions can be found using the available models. We observe a strong energy dependence of the resulting proton fractions, and find no support from any of the models for a significant contribution from iron nuclei. However, we also observe a significant disagreement between the models with respect to the relative contributions of the intermediate components.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number122006
    Number of pages12
    JournalPhysical Review D
    Volume90
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 31-Dec-2014

    Keywords

    • COSMIC-RAYS
    • SIMULATION

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Depth of maximum of air-shower profiles at the Pierre Auger Observatory. II. Composition implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this