Determinants of failure of brachiocephalic elbow fistulas for haemodialysis

CJ Zeebregts*, IFJ Tielliu, RG Hulsebos, C de Bruin, ELG Verhoeven, RM Huisman, JJAM van den Dungen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. The aim of this study was to analyse the results of brachiocephalic fistulas for haemodialysis and to determine possible predictors of failure.

Patients and methods. Between April 1999 and September 2004, a consecutive series of 100 autologous brachiocephalic fistulas were created in 96 patients. There were 57 men and 39 women with a mean (SD) age of 59.2 (15.6) years. Data were prospectively gathered.

Results. The mean (SD) follow-up was 20.1 (16.4) months. The primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates after 6 months were 73.4, 83.2 and 86.4%, respectively. After 1 year these figures were 54.7, 72.3 and 79.2%, and after 2 years 40.4, 59.2 and 67.5%, respectively. Predictors of failure with regard to primary patency, determined with Cox regression multivariate analysis, included diabetes mellitus (HR 2.81, p <0.001) and a history of contralateral PTFE loop graft (HR 7.79, p = 0. 007).

Conclusion. Primary patency of brachiocephalic fistulas is comparable to that of radiocephalic fistulas. Primary assisted and secondary patency rates can, however, be brought to a much higher level, especially in patients without diabetes and a large-diameter venous outflow tract.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-214
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug-2005

Keywords

  • brachiocephalic fistula
  • gracz
  • haemodialysis
  • patency
  • predictor
  • diabetes
  • ARTERIOVENOUS-FISTULA
  • VASCULAR ACCESS
  • RECOMMENDED STANDARDS
  • SURVIVAL

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Determinants of failure of brachiocephalic elbow fistulas for haemodialysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this