Determinants of the Quality of Warfarin Control after Venous Thromboembolism and Validation of the SAMe-TT2-R2 Score: An Analysis of Hokusai-VTE

Stefano Barco*, Serena Granziera, Michiel Coppens, Jonathan Douxfils, Mathilde Nijkeuter, Nicoletta Riva, Thomas Vanassche, George Zhang, Min Lin, Pieter W. Kamphuisen, Alexander T. Cohen, Jan Beyer-Westendorf

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
90 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background Time in therapeutic range (TTR) measures the quality of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) anticoagulation. In patients with atrial fibrillation, the dichotomized SAMe-TT2-R2 score (>= 2 vs. <2 points) can predict if adequate TTR is unlikely to be achieved.

Aims We validated the SAMe-TT2-R2 score in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) randomized to the warfarin arm of the Hokusai-VTE trial.

Patients and Methods A total of 3,874 patients were included in the primary analysis (day 31-180 from randomization). The efficacy and safety outcomes were symptomatic recurrent VTE and major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding.

Results The rates of recurrent VTE and bleeding events were higher in patients with a TTR below the median (<66% vs. >= 66%) resulting in an absolute risk difference (ARD) of +0.5% (95% confidence interval: 0%, +1.1%) and +2.2% (0.9%, +3.5%), respectively. Patients with high SAMe-TT2-R2 score were 76% of total and had lower median TTR (64.7% vs. 70.7%). The SAMe-TT2-R2 score exhibited low negative (0.59) and positive (0.52) predictive value (TTR threshold 66%), and poor discrimination (c-statistic, 0.58). ARD between patients with high and low score was 0% (-0.6%, +0.7%) for recurrence and +1.3% (-0.1%, +2.7%) for bleeding. Results were confirmed in sensitivity analyses focusing on the whole study period (day 1-365).

Conclusion In VTE patients, the SAMe-TT2-R2 score showed unsatisfactory discrimination and predictive value for individual TTR and did not correlate well with clinical outcomes. The choice of starting a patient on VKA cannot be based on this parameter and its routine use after VTE may not translate into clinical usefulness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)675-684
Number of pages10
JournalThrombosis and Haemostasis
Volume119
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr-2019

Keywords

  • vitamin K antagonist
  • quality of treatment
  • warfarin
  • venous thromboembolism
  • risk assessment model
  • NONVALVULAR ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION
  • VITAMIN-K ANTAGONISTS
  • ANTICOAGULATION CONTROL
  • EXTERNAL VALIDATION
  • ORAL ANTICOAGULANT
  • THERAPY
  • RISK
  • TIME
  • EDOXABAN
  • PREDICTS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Determinants of the Quality of Warfarin Control after Venous Thromboembolism and Validation of the SAMe-TT2-R2 Score: An Analysis of Hokusai-VTE'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this