Deterrence of birds with an artificial predator, the RobotFalcon

Rolf F Storms, Claudio Carere, Robert Musters, Hans van Gasteren, Simon Verhulst, Charlotte K Hemelrijk*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
141 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Collisions between birds and airplanes can damage aircrafts, resulting in delays and cancellation of flights, costing the international civil aviation industry more than 1.4 billion US dollars annually. Driving away birds is therefore crucial, but the effectiveness of current deterrence methods is limited. Live avian predators can be an effective deterrent, because potential prey will not habituate to them, but live predators cannot be controlled entirely. Thus, there is an urgent need for new deterrence methods. We developed the RobotFalcon, a device modelled after the peregrine falcon, and tested its effectiveness to deter flocks of corvids, gulls, starlings and lapwings. We compared its effectiveness with that of a drone, and of conventional methods routinely applied at a military airbase. The RobotFalcon scared away bird flocks from fields immediately, and these fields subsequently remained free of bird flocks for hours. The RobotFalcon outperformed the drone and the best conventional method at the airbase (distress calls). Importantly, there was no evidence that bird flocks habituated to the RobotFalcon over the course of the fieldwork. We conclude that the RobotFalcon is a practical and ethical solution to drive away bird flocks with all advantages of live predators but without their limitations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20220497
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the Royal Society Interface
Volume19
Issue number195
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26-Oct-2022

Keywords

  • Animals
  • Predatory Behavior
  • Birds
  • Charadriiformes
  • Fear

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deterrence of birds with an artificial predator, the RobotFalcon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this