Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model Based on MRI and Clinical Characteristics to Predict Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression

Christian Roest*, Thomas C Kwee, Igle J de Jong, Ivo G Schoots, Pim van Leeuwen, Stijn W T P J Heijmink, Henk G van der Poel, Stefan J Fransen, Anindo Saha, Henkjan Huisman, Derya Yakar

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To validate a deep learning (DL) model for predicting the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) progression based on MRI and clinical parameters and compare it with established models.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 1607 MRI scans of 1143 male patients (median age, 64 years; IQR, 59-68 years) undergoing MRI for suspicion of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) (International Society of Urological Pathology grade > 1) between January 2012 and May 2022 who were negative for csPCa at baseline MRI. A DL model was developed using baseline MRI and clinical parameters (age, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level, PSA density, and prostate volume) to predict the time to PCa progression (defined as csPCa diagnosis at follow-up). Internal and external testing was performed. The model's ability to predict progression to csPCa was assessed by Cox regression analyses. Predictive performance of the DL model up to 5 years after baseline MRI in comparison with the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) future-risk calculator, Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) risk calculator, and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) was assessed using the Harrell C-index. Optimized follow-up intervals were derived from Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results: DL scores predicted csPCa progression (internal cohort: hazard ratio [HR], 1.97 [95% CI: 1.61, 2.41; P < .001]; external cohort: HR, 1.32 [95% CI: 1.14, 1.55; P < .001]). The model identified a subgroup of patients (approximately 20%) with risks for csPCa of 3% or less, 8% or less, and 18% or less after 1-, 2-, and 4-year follow-up, respectively. DL scores had a C-index of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.74) at internal testing and 0.56 (95% CI: 0.51, 0.61) at external testing, outperforming ERSPC and PCPT (both P < .001) at internal testing.

Conclusion: The DL model accurately predicted PCa progression and provided improved risk estimations, demonstrating its ability to aid in personalized follow-up for low-risk PCa.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere240078
Number of pages9
JournalRadiology: Imaging Cancer
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan-2025

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Male
  • Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
  • Deep Learning
  • Disease Progression
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood
  • Prostate/diagnostic imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model Based on MRI and Clinical Characteristics to Predict Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this