Development of prognostic models for Health-Related Quality of Life following traumatic brain injury

CENTER-TBI Collaborators, Isabel R. A. Retel Helmrich*, David van Klaveren, Simone A. Dijkland, Hester F. Lingsma, Suzanne Polinder, Lindsay Wilson, Nicole von Steinbuechel, Joukje van der Naalt, Andrew I. R. Maas, Ewout W. Steyerberg

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    17 Citations (Scopus)
    224 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of impairments affecting Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). We aimed to identify predictors of and develop prognostic models for HRQoL following TBI. Methods We used data from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Core study, including patients with a clinical diagnosis of TBI and an indication for computed tomography presenting within 24 h of injury. The primary outcome measures were the SF-36v2 physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) health component summary scores and the Quality of Life after Traumatic Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) total score 6 months post injury. We considered 16 patient and injury characteristics in linear regression analyses. Model performance was expressed as proportion of variance explained (R-2) and corrected for optimism with bootstrap procedures. Results 2666 Adult patients completed the HRQoL questionnaires. Most were mild TBI patients (74%). The strongest predictors for PCS were Glasgow Coma Scale, major extracranial injury, and pre-injury health status, while MCS and QOLIBRI were mainly related to pre-injury mental health problems, level of education, and type of employment. R-2 of the full models was 19% for PCS, 9% for MCS, and 13% for the QOLIBRI. In a subset of patients following predominantly mild TBI (N = 436), including 2 week HRQoL assessment improved model performance substantially (R-2 PCS 15% to 37%, MCS 12% to 36%, and QOLIBRI 10% to 48%). Conclusion Medical and injury-related characteristics are of greatest importance for the prediction of PCS, whereas patient-related characteristics are more important for the prediction of MCS and the QOLIBRI following TBI.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)451–471
    Number of pages21
    JournalQuality of Life Research
    Volume31
    Early online date30-Jul-2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb-2022

    Keywords

    • Prognostic model research
    • Traumatic brain injury
    • Health-related quality of life
    • SF-36
    • QOLIBRI
    • COPING STRATEGIES
    • CENTER-TBI
    • MILD
    • MODERATE
    • PREDICTORS
    • SCALE
    • SATISFACTION
    • OUTCOMES
    • ADULTS

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Development of prognostic models for Health-Related Quality of Life following traumatic brain injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this