Did technology shocks drive the great depression? Explaining cyclical productivity movements in US manufacturing, 1919-1939

Robert Inklaar*, Herman de Jong, Reitze Gouma

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)
444 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Technology shocks and declining productivity have been advanced as important factors driving the Great Depression in the United States, based on real business cycle theory. We estimate an improved measure of technology for interwar manufacturing, using data from the U.S. census reports. There is clear evidence of increasing returns to scale and we find no statistical proof that technology shocks led to changes in hours worked or other inputs. This contradicts a key prediction of real business cycle theory. We find that increasing returns to scale are not due to market power but to labor and capital hoarding.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)827-858
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Economic History
Volume71
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec-2011

Keywords

  • PROCYCLICAL LABOR PRODUCTIVITY
  • AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION
  • UNITED-STATES
  • BUSINESS-CYCLE
  • INDUSTRIES
  • EMPLOYMENT
  • EARNINGS
  • RETURNS
  • INPUT
  • SCALE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Did technology shocks drive the great depression? Explaining cyclical productivity movements in US manufacturing, 1919-1939'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this