TY - JOUR
T1 - Differentiating Animality from Agency. Towards a Foundation for Cognition
AU - Keijzer, F.A.
N1 - Relation: http://www.rug.nl/
date_submitted:2008
Rights: F.A. Keijzer
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - The notion of cognition has been difficult to pin down.
Embodied and situated approaches to cognition now
suggests that agency, construed in terms of perceptionaction
coupling, might provide a clear foundation for
cognition. Yet, this attempt has problems of its own.
First, a demarcation problem: Which systems are agents
and why? Second, a graduality problem: Agency is a
way of describing that is either used or not, and it is
difficult to envision an incremental route toward
agency. To overcome these problems, I differentiate
between agency and a new notion, animality. Animality
can be described as the sensorimotor organization by
means of which animals modify environmental
conditions. By developing this notion of animality I
claim that it becomes possible to get a grip on the
foundational problems of cognition and agency.
AB - The notion of cognition has been difficult to pin down.
Embodied and situated approaches to cognition now
suggests that agency, construed in terms of perceptionaction
coupling, might provide a clear foundation for
cognition. Yet, this attempt has problems of its own.
First, a demarcation problem: Which systems are agents
and why? Second, a graduality problem: Agency is a
way of describing that is either used or not, and it is
difficult to envision an incremental route toward
agency. To overcome these problems, I differentiate
between agency and a new notion, animality. Animality
can be described as the sensorimotor organization by
means of which animals modify environmental
conditions. By developing this notion of animality I
claim that it becomes possible to get a grip on the
foundational problems of cognition and agency.
M3 - Article
SP - 1593
EP - 1598
JO - Proceedings of CogSci/ICCS 2006, 1593-1598
JF - Proceedings of CogSci/ICCS 2006, 1593-1598
ER -