Abstract
This study compares a problem-solving account of discovery through writing, which attributes discovery to strategic rhetorical planning and assumes discovery is associated with better quality text, to a dual-process account, which attributes discovery to the combined effect of 2 conflicting processes with opposing relationships to text quality. Low and high self-monitors were asked to write under 2 planning conditions. Keystroke-logging was used to assess the relationship of writing processes with discovery and text quality. The results support the dual-process account: Discovery was related to spontaneous sentence production and global revision of text, which had opposing relationships with text quality.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 199-223 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | Cognition and instruction |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 21-May-2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Keywords
- COMPLEMENTARY LEARNING-SYSTEMS
- INSTRUCTION
- STRATEGIES
- MEMORY
- TEACHABILITY
- PERFORMANCE
- HIPPOCAMPUS
- BELIEFS
- GRAMMAR
- MODELS