Dispositional optimism weakly predicts upward, rather than downward, counterfactual thinking: A prospective correlational study using episodic recall

Jessica Gamlin*, Rachel Smallman, Kai Epstude, Neal J. Roese

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
181 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Counterfactual thoughts center on how the past could have been different. Such thoughts may be differentiated in terms of direction of comparison, such that upward counterfactuals focus on how the past could have been better, whereas downward counterfactuals focus on how the past could have been worse. A key question is how such past-oriented thoughts connect to future-oriented individual differences such as optimism. Ambiguities surround a series of past studies in which optimism predicted relatively greater downward counterfactual thinking. Our main study (N= 1150) and six supplementary studies (N= 1901) re-examined this link to reveal a different result, a weak relation between optimism and upward (rather than downward) counterfactual thinking. These results offer an important correction to the counterfactual literature and are informative for theory on individual differences in optimism.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0237644
Number of pages12
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume15
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14-Aug-2020

Keywords

  • DEFENSIVE PESSIMISM
  • FUNCTIONAL THEORY
  • THOUGHTS
  • COULD
  • ADAPTATION
  • REFLECTION
  • HEALTH
  • IMPACT
  • WORSE
  • MOOD

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dispositional optimism weakly predicts upward, rather than downward, counterfactual thinking: A prospective correlational study using episodic recall'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this