Distinction between major and minor Bacillus signal peptidases based on phylogenetic and structural criteria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The processing of secretory preproteins by signal peptidases (SPases) is essential for cell viability. As previously shown for Bacillus subtilis, only certain SPases of organisms containing multiple paralogous SPases are essential. This allows a distinction between SPases that are of major and minor importance for cell viability. Notably, the functional difference between major and minor SPases is not reflected clearly in sequence alignments. Here, we have successfully used molecular phylogeny to predict major and minor SPases, The results were verified with SPases from various bacilli, As predicted, the latter enzymes behaved as major or minor SPases when expressed in B. subtilis. Strikingly, molecular modeling indicated that the active site geometry is not a critical parameter for the classification of major and minor Bacillus SPases, Even though the substrate binding site of the minor SPase SipV is smaller than that of other known SPases, SipV could be converted into a major SPase without changing this site. Instead, replacement of amino-terminal residues of SipV with corresponding residues of the major SPase SipS was sufficient for conversion of SipV into a major SPase, This suggests that differences between major and minor SPases are based on activities other than substrate cleavage site selection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25230-25235
Number of pages6
JournalThe Journal of Biological Chemistry
Volume276
Issue number27
Publication statusPublished - 6-Jul-2001

Keywords

  • TEMPORALLY CONTROLLED EXPRESSION
  • MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT
  • ESCHERICHIA-COLI
  • ACTIVE-SITE
  • SUBTILIS
  • IDENTIFICATION
  • SECRETION
  • PROTEIN
  • SIPS
  • MECHANISM

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Distinction between major and minor Bacillus signal peptidases based on phylogenetic and structural criteria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this