Abstract
To foster competition, governments can intervene by auctioning licenses to operate, or by imposing divestitures. The Dutch government has done exactly that, organizing auctions to redistribute tenancy rights for highway gasoline stations and imposing divestitures of such stations on the four major companies. We evaluate this policy experiment and find that the auctioning of licenses without an obligation to divest has no discernible effect on prices. An obligation to divest lowers prices by 1.3-2.3% at divested sites. Moreover, prices decrease by 0.9-1.2% at sites nearby. This suggests that the observed price decreases are at least partly due to competitive spillovers.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 467-502 |
Number of pages | 36 |
Journal | Journal of Industrial Economics |
Volume | 62 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept-2014 |
Keywords
- VERTICAL RELATIONSHIPS
- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
- EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE
- CONTRACT CHANGES
- PRICE CYCLES
- ESTIMATORS
- GAS
- LAW
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Do Auctions and Forced Divestitures Increase Competition? Evidence for Retail Gasoline Markets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Retail gasoline prices in the Netherlands 2005 - 2011
Heijnen, P. (Creator) & Soetevent, A. (Contributor), DANS - Data Archiving and Networking Services, 1-Jun-2016
Dataset