Do episodic counterfactual thoughts focus on personally controllable action? The role of self-initiation

Neal J. Roese, Rachel Smallman, Kai Epstude

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
44 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Counterfactual thoughts refer to alternatives to the past. Episodic counterfactual thoughts have in past research been shown to be primarily goal-directed and to engender performance improvement. Some past research supports this perspective with the observation that episodic counterfactuals center mostly on controllable action, whereas other research does not show this. We offer a theoretical resolution for these discrepant findings centering on the role of self-initiation, such that counterfactuals more often focus on internally controllable action to the extent that the circumstance is one that was self-initiated rather than initiated by others. In doing so, we disambiguate two dimensions of causal explanation: locus (self vs. other) and controllability (high vs. low) that previous studies conflated, demonstrating that variation as a function of self-initiation in the content of episodic counterfactuals occurs primarily along the former but not the latter dimension. These results support the functional theory of counterfactual thinking.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14-23
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume73
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6-Jun-2017

Keywords

  • FUTURE
  • HAPPEN
  • WORSE POSSIBLE WORLDS
  • MENTAL SIMULATION
  • NORM THEORY
  • THINKING
  • EVENTS
  • MIGHT
  • ATTRIBUTION
  • ASYMMETRY

Cite this