Abstract
Many philosophers think that normative judgements do not aim to represent the world. In this paper, I argue that this view is incompatible with the thought that when two people make conflicting normative judgements, at most one of these judgements is correct. I argue that this shows that normative judgements do aim to represent the world.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 450-470 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Ratio |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec-2013 |
Keywords
- Non-cognitivism
- Error theory
- Irrealism