TY - JOUR
T1 - Does non-invasive prenatal testing affect the livebirth prevalence of Down syndrome in the Netherlands? A population-based register study
AU - de Groot-van der Mooren, Maurike
AU - de Graaf, Gert
AU - Weijerman, Michel E.
AU - Hoffer, Mariette J. V.
AU - Knijnenburg, Jeroen
AU - van der Kevie-Kersemaekers, Anne-Marie M. F.
AU - Kooper, Angelique J. A.
AU - Voorhoeve, Els
AU - Sikkema-Raddatz, Birgit
AU - van Zutven, Laura J. C. M.
AU - Srebniak, Malgorzata Ilona
AU - Huijsdens-van Amsterdam, Karin
AU - Engelen, John J. M.
AU - Smeets, Dominique
AU - van Kaam, Anton H.
AU - Cornel, Martina C.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Objective To evaluate if non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) affects livebirth (LB) prevalence of Down syndrome (DS) in the Netherlands. Method Data from clinical genetics laboratories and the Working Party on Prenatal Diagnosis and Therapy (2014-2018) and previous published data (1991-2013) were used to assess trends for DS LB prevalence and reduction percentage (the net decrease in DS LBs resulting from selective termination of pregnancies). Statistics Netherlands provided general population data. Results DS LB prevalence increased from 11.6/10,000 in 1991 to 15.9/10,000 in 2002 (regression coefficient 0.246 [95% CI: 0.105-0.388; p = 0.003]). After 2002, LB prevalence decreased to 11.3/10,000 in 2014 and further to 9.9/10,000 in 2018 (regression coefficient 0.234 (95% CI: -0.338 to -0.131; p < 0.001). The reduction percentage increased from 26% in 1991 to 55.2% in 2018 (regression coefficient 0.012 (95% CI: 0.010-0.013; p < 0.001)). There were no trend changes after introducing NIPT as second-tier (2014) and first-tier test (2017). Conclusions Introducing NIPT did not change the decreasing trend in DS LB prevalence and increasing trend in reduction percentage. These trends may be caused by a broader development of more prenatal testing that had already started before introducing NIPT.
AB - Objective To evaluate if non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) affects livebirth (LB) prevalence of Down syndrome (DS) in the Netherlands. Method Data from clinical genetics laboratories and the Working Party on Prenatal Diagnosis and Therapy (2014-2018) and previous published data (1991-2013) were used to assess trends for DS LB prevalence and reduction percentage (the net decrease in DS LBs resulting from selective termination of pregnancies). Statistics Netherlands provided general population data. Results DS LB prevalence increased from 11.6/10,000 in 1991 to 15.9/10,000 in 2002 (regression coefficient 0.246 [95% CI: 0.105-0.388; p = 0.003]). After 2002, LB prevalence decreased to 11.3/10,000 in 2014 and further to 9.9/10,000 in 2018 (regression coefficient 0.234 (95% CI: -0.338 to -0.131; p < 0.001). The reduction percentage increased from 26% in 1991 to 55.2% in 2018 (regression coefficient 0.012 (95% CI: 0.010-0.013; p < 0.001)). There were no trend changes after introducing NIPT as second-tier (2014) and first-tier test (2017). Conclusions Introducing NIPT did not change the decreasing trend in DS LB prevalence and increasing trend in reduction percentage. These trends may be caused by a broader development of more prenatal testing that had already started before introducing NIPT.
KW - LIVE BIRTH PREVALENCE
KW - MATERNAL AGE
KW - TRENDS
KW - IMPACT
KW - EPIDEMIOLOGY
KW - TRISOMIES
U2 - 10.1002/pd.6003
DO - 10.1002/pd.6003
M3 - Article
SN - 0197-3851
VL - 41
SP - 1351
EP - 1359
JO - Prenatal Diagnosis
JF - Prenatal Diagnosis
IS - 10
ER -