Abstract
In this paper unit-root tests for per capita output of 12 OECD countries are performed. Using traditional unit-root tests, it follows that the unit-root hypothesis cannot be rejected except for the US. However, following the approach of Perron (1989), which takes shifts in mean and/or trend into account, the null hypothesis of a unit-root can be rejected in most countries in our sample. In contrast to Perron, a method suggested by Christiano (1992) is used to determine the break date endogenously.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 953-960 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Applied Economics |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul-1993 |
Keywords
- AUTOREGRESSIVE TIME-SERIES
- RANDOM-WALK
- FLUCTUATIONS
- TRENDS
- GNP
- TRANSITORY
- HYPOTHESIS
- PERMANENT
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does output have a unit root? New international evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver