Abstract
In the course of discussing the nature of justice in the first book of the Republic, a number of claims are made concerning the nature of technê and what it is to be skilful or to have an ability. Nawar shows how three of these claims, which do significant conceptual work in both Plato and Aristotle, can be explained and defended. The first claim, by Socrates, concerns the ‘two-way’ nature of certain skills. For instance, the person who is skilful at hitting is not only proficient at hitting well, but also proficient at avoiding being hit. The second claim, by Thrasymachus, is that the practitioner of a technê is, in a certain way, infallible and cannot fail to bring about what they intend. The third claim, made by Socrates, is that technai are not value-neutral, but rather are directed at the good of their object. Namar examines these claims, clarifies them, and attempts to explain them (so far as possible). Furthermore, he shows that these claims play an important role in Aristotle’s thought and examines how Aristotle aims to incorporate or adapt these claims in his own discussion of the modal and teleological aspects of skills and rational capacities.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy |
Subtitle of host publication | The Concept of Technê |
Editors | Thomas Johansen |
Place of Publication | Cambridge |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Chapter | 2 |
Pages | 39-61 |
Number of pages | 23 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781108641579 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |