Economic Evaluation of a Problem Solving Intervention to Prevent Recurrent Sickness Absence in Workers with Common Mental Disorders

Iris Arends*, Ute Bulmann, Willem van Rhenen, Henk Groen, Jac J. L. van der Klink

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)
201 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives: Workers with common mental disorders (CMDs) frequently experience recurrent sickness absence but scientifically evaluated interventions to prevent recurrences are lacking. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of a problem solving intervention aimed at preventing recurrent sickness absence in workers with CMDs compared to care as usual.

Methods: An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a cluster-randomised controlled trial with 12 months follow-up. Treatment providers were randomised to either a 2-day training in the SHARP-at work intervention, i.e. a problem solving intervention, or care as usual. Effect outcomes were the incidence of recurrent sickness absence and time to recurrent sickness absence. Self-reported health care utilisation was measured by questionnaires. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) from the societal perspective and a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) from the employer's perspective were conducted.

Results: The CEA showed that the SHARP-at work intervention was more effective but also more expensive than care as usual. The CBA revealed that employer's occupational health care costs were significantly higher in the intervention group compared to care as usual. Overall, the SHARP-at work intervention showed no economic benefit compared to care as usual.

Conclusions: As implementation of the SHARP-at work intervention might require additional investments, health care policy makers need to decide if these investments are worthwhile considering the results that can be accomplished in reducing recurrent sickness absence.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere71937
Number of pages10
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume8
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12-Aug-2013

Keywords

  • RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL
  • COST-EFFECTIVENESS
  • LISTED EMPLOYEES
  • ACTIVATING INTERVENTION
  • WORKPLACE INTERVENTION
  • DEPRESSION
  • HEALTH
  • IMPACT
  • PRODUCTIVITY
  • PERFORMANCE

Cite this