Effect of moderate or intensive disease management program on outcome in patients with heart failure: Coordinating Study Evaluating Outcomes of Advising and Counseling in Heart Failure (COACH)

T. Jaarsma, Martje H.L. van der Wal, Ivonne Lesman-Leegte, Marie-Louise Luttik, Jochem Hogenhuis, Nic J. Veeger, Robbert Sanderman, A.W. Hoes, Wiek H. van Gilst, D.J. Lok, P.H. Dunselman, J.G. Tijssen, Hans L. Hillege, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

418 Citations (Scopus)
365 Downloads (Pure)


Background:: Heart failure (HF) disease management programs are widely implemented, but data about their effect on outcome have been inconsistent.

Methods: The Coordinating Stud), Evaluating Out-comes of Advising and Counseling in Heart Failure (COACH) was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in which 1023 patients were enrolled after hospitalization because of HF. Patients were assigned to 1 of 3 groups: a control group (follow-up by a cardiologist) and 2 intervention groups with additional basic or intensive support by a nurse specializing in management of patients with HF. Patients were studied for 18 months. Primary end points were time to death or rehospitalization because of HF and the number of days lost to death or hospitalization.

Results: Mean patient age was 71 years; 38% were women; and 50% of patients had mild HF and 50% had moderate to severe HF. During the study, 411 patients (40%) were readmitted because of HF or died from any cause: 42% in the control group, and 41% and 38% in the basic and intensive support groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.96 and 0.93, respectively; P=.73 and P=.52, respectively). The number of days lost to death or hospitalization was 39 960 in the control group, 33 731 days for the basic intervention group (P =.81), and 34 268 for the intensive support group (P =.49). All-cause mortality occurred in 29% of patients in the control group, and there was a trend toward lower mortality in the intervention groups combined (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.08 P=.18). There were slightly more hospitalizations in the 2 intervention groups (basic intervention group, P =.89; and intensive support group, P =.60).

Conclusions: Neither moderate nor intensive disease management by a nurse specializing in management of patients with HF reduced the combined end points of death and hospitalization because of HF compared with standard follow-up. There was a nonsignificant, potentially relevant reduction in mortality, accompanied by a slight increase in the number of short hospitalizations in both intervention groups.

Clinical Trial Registry: http://trialregister.nl Identifier: NCT 98675639.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)316-324
Number of pages9
JournalArchives of Internal Medicine
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 11-Feb-2008
Event56th Annual Scientific Session of the American-College-of-Cardiology - , Lao People's Democratic Republic
Duration: 24-Mar-200727-Mar-2007


  • CARE

Cite this