TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and Safety of Rovalpituzumab Tesirine Compared With Topotecan as Second-Line Therapy in DLL3-High SCLC
T2 - Results From the Phase 3 TAHOE Study
AU - Blackhall, Fiona
AU - Jao, Kevin
AU - Greillier, Laurent
AU - Cho, Byoung Chul
AU - Penkov, Konstantin
AU - Reguart, Noemi
AU - Majem, Margarita
AU - Nackaerts, Kristiaan
AU - Syrigos, Konstantinos
AU - Hansen, Karin
AU - Schuette, Wolfgang
AU - Cetnar, Jeremy
AU - Cappuzzo, Federico
AU - Okamoto, Isamu
AU - Erman, Mustafa
AU - Langer, Seppo W
AU - Kato, Terufumi
AU - Groen, Harry
AU - Sun, Zhaowen
AU - Luo, Yan
AU - Tanwani, Poonam
AU - Caffrey, Laura
AU - Komarnitsky, Philip
AU - Reinmuth, Niels
N1 - Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Introduction: DLL3, an atypical Notch ligand, is expressed in SCLC tumors but is not detectable in normal adult tissues. Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) is an antibody-drug conjugate containing a DLL3-targeting antibody tethered to a cytotoxic agent pyrrolobenzodiazepine by means of a protease-cleavable linker. The efficacy and safety of Rova-T compared with topotecan as second-line therapy in patients with SCLC expressing high levels of DLL3 (DLL3-high) was evaluated.Methods: The TAHOE study was an open-label, two-to-one randomized, phase 3 study comparing Rova-T with topotecan as second-line therapy in DLL3-high advanced or metastatic SCLC. Rova-T (0.3 mg/kg) was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 42-day cycle for two cycles, with two additional cycles available to patients who met protocol-defined criteria for continued dosing. Topotecan (1.5 mg/m(2)) was administered intravenously on days 1 to 5 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was overall survival (OS).Results: Patients randomized to Rova-T (n = 296) and topotecan (n = 148) were included in the efficacy analyses. The median age was 64 years, and 77% had the extensive disease at initial diagnosis. The median OS (95% confidence interval) was 6.3 months (5.6-7.3) in the Rova-T arm and 8.6 months (7.7-10.1) in the topotecan arm (hazard ratio, 1.46 [95% confidence interval: 1.17-1.82]). An independent data monitoring committee recommended that enrollment be discontinued because of the shorter OS observed with Rova-T compared with topotecan. Safety profiles for both drugs were consistent with previous reports.Conclusions: Compared with topotecan, which is the current standard second-line chemotherapy, Rova-T exhibited an inferior OS and higher rates of serosal effusions, photosensitivity reaction, and peripheral edema in patients with SCLC. A considerable unmet therapeutic need remains in this population. (C) 2021 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc.
AB - Introduction: DLL3, an atypical Notch ligand, is expressed in SCLC tumors but is not detectable in normal adult tissues. Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) is an antibody-drug conjugate containing a DLL3-targeting antibody tethered to a cytotoxic agent pyrrolobenzodiazepine by means of a protease-cleavable linker. The efficacy and safety of Rova-T compared with topotecan as second-line therapy in patients with SCLC expressing high levels of DLL3 (DLL3-high) was evaluated.Methods: The TAHOE study was an open-label, two-to-one randomized, phase 3 study comparing Rova-T with topotecan as second-line therapy in DLL3-high advanced or metastatic SCLC. Rova-T (0.3 mg/kg) was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 42-day cycle for two cycles, with two additional cycles available to patients who met protocol-defined criteria for continued dosing. Topotecan (1.5 mg/m(2)) was administered intravenously on days 1 to 5 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was overall survival (OS).Results: Patients randomized to Rova-T (n = 296) and topotecan (n = 148) were included in the efficacy analyses. The median age was 64 years, and 77% had the extensive disease at initial diagnosis. The median OS (95% confidence interval) was 6.3 months (5.6-7.3) in the Rova-T arm and 8.6 months (7.7-10.1) in the topotecan arm (hazard ratio, 1.46 [95% confidence interval: 1.17-1.82]). An independent data monitoring committee recommended that enrollment be discontinued because of the shorter OS observed with Rova-T compared with topotecan. Safety profiles for both drugs were consistent with previous reports.Conclusions: Compared with topotecan, which is the current standard second-line chemotherapy, Rova-T exhibited an inferior OS and higher rates of serosal effusions, photosensitivity reaction, and peripheral edema in patients with SCLC. A considerable unmet therapeutic need remains in this population. (C) 2021 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc.
KW - Small cell lung cancer
KW - Rovalpituzumab tesirine
KW - Delta-like protein 3
KW - Topotecan
KW - CELL LUNG-CANCER
KW - DRUG
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.02.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.02.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 33607312
SN - 1556-0864
VL - 16
SP - 1547
EP - 1558
JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
IS - 9
ER -