Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy versus surgical gastrojejunostomy for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (ENDURO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group, Janine B. Kastelijn, Yorick L. van de Pavert*, Marc G. Besselink, Paul Fockens, Rogier P. Voermans, Roy L.J. van Wanrooij, Thomas R. de Wijkerslooth, Wouter L. Curvers, Ignace H.J.T. de Hingh, Marco J. Bruno, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Gijs A. Patijn, Alexander C. Poen, Jeanin E. van Hooft, Akin Inderson, J. Sven D. Mieog, Jan Werner Poley, Alderina Bijlsma, Daan J. LipsNiels G. Venneman, Robert C. Verdonk, Hendrik M. van Dullemen, Frederik J.H. Hoogwater, Geert W.J. Frederix

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)
    78 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background: Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a debilitating condition that frequently occurs in patients with malignancies of the distal stomach and (peri)ampullary region. The standard palliative treatment for patients with a reasonable life expectancy and adequate performance status is a laparoscopic surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ). Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) emerged as a promising alternative to the surgical approach. The present study aims to compare these treatment modalities in terms of efficacy, safety, and costs.

    Methods: The ENDURO-study is a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. In total, ninety-six patients with gastric outlet obstruction caused by an irresectable or metastasized malignancy will be 1:1 randomized to either SGJ or EUS-GE. The primary endpoint is time to tolerate at least soft solids. The co-primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with persisting or recurring symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction for which a reintervention is required. Secondary endpoints are technical and clinical success, quality of life, gastroenterostomy dysfunction, reinterventions, time to reintervention, adverse events, quality of life, time to start chemotherapy, length of hospital stay, readmissions, weight, survival, and costs.

    Discussion: The ENDURO-study assesses whether EUS-GE, as compared to SGJ, results in a faster resumption of solid oral intake and is non-inferior regarding reinterventions for persistent or recurrent obstructive symptoms in patients with malignant GOO. This trial aims to guide future treatment strategies and to improve quality of life in a palliative setting.

    Trial registration: International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP): NL9592. Registered on 07 July 2021.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number608
    Number of pages14
    JournalTrials
    Volume24
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec-2023

    Keywords

    • Clinical trial
    • Endoscopic ultrasonography
    • Gastric outlet obstruction
    • Gastroenterostomy
    • Gastrojejunostomy
    • Malignancy
    • Surgery

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy versus surgical gastrojejunostomy for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (ENDURO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this