Environmental Stimulation Does Not Reduce Impulsive Choice in ADHD: A "Pink Noise" Study

Baris Metin*, Herbert Roeyers, Jan R. Wiersema, Jaap J. van der Meere, Roos Gasthuys, Edmund Sonuga-Barke

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
147 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: The preference for sooner smaller over larger later rewards is a prominent manifestation of impulsivity in ADHD. According to the State Regulation Deficit (SRD) model, this impulsive choice is the result of impaired regulation of arousal level and can be alleviated by adding environmental stimulation to increase levels of arousal. Method: To test this prediction, we studied the effects of adding background pink noise on impulsive choice using a classical and new adjusting choice delay task in a sample of 25 children with ADHD and 28 controls. Results: Children with ADHD made more impulsive choices than controls. Adding noise did not reduce impulsive choice in ADHD. Conclusion: The findings add to the existing evidence on impulsive choice in ADHD, but no evidence is found for the SRD model's explanation of this behavioral style. Alternative explanations for impulsive choice in ADHD are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-70
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Attention Disorders
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan-2016

Keywords

  • ADHD
  • pink noise
  • delay aversion
  • state regulation deficits
  • impulsivity
  • ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER
  • REACTION-TIME VARIABILITY
  • DELAY AVERSION
  • EVENT RATE
  • EXECUTIVE DYSFUNCTION
  • COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE
  • SUSTAINED ATTENTION
  • RESPONSE-INHIBITION
  • LOCUS-COERULEUS
  • CHILDREN

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental Stimulation Does Not Reduce Impulsive Choice in ADHD: A "Pink Noise" Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this