TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence for pathogenicity of BRCA2 c.8351G>A p.(Arg2784Gln) and the challenges in classification of pathogenic variants with reduced penetrance
AU - Moghadasi, Setareh
AU - Zanti, Maria
AU - Bleeker, Fonnet
AU - Blok, Marinus
AU - Braspenning, Merel E.
AU - Cerna, Marta
AU - Collee, Margriet J.
AU - Engel, Christoph
AU - Hopman, Saskia
AU - Kleiblova, Petra
AU - Koole, Wouter
AU - Mensenkamp, Arjen
AU - Overwater, Eline
AU - Palmero, Edenir Inez
AU - Snijders Blok, Lot
AU - Storm, Katrien
AU - Stringa, Najada
AU - Wevers, Marijke R.
AU - Vreeswijk, Maaike P.G.
AU - Goldgar, David
AU - Michailidou, Kyriaki
AU - Gómez García, Encarna B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
PY - 2026/2
Y1 - 2026/2
N2 - Background: The BRCA2 c.8351G>Ap.(Arg2784Gln) variant has long been classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) due to conflicting evidence used in variant classification. This study aims to clarify its pathogenicity and associated risks for breast and ovarian cancer.Methods: This study was conducted by the international Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles consortium. We collected data from 29 informative families with this variant. Co-segregation likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated using the full-likelihood method to assess pathogenicity, and cancer risks were estimated with modified segregation analysis.Results: Co-segregation analysis using a grid search across scaled penetrance levels for BRCA2 truncating variants yielded the strongest evidence in favour of pathogenicity, with LR maximised at approximately 20% of full penetrance (LR=11.026). Furthermore, estimated breast cancer risks were markedly higher for early onset breast cancer; women diagnosed at <50 years had a HR of 4.5, compared with a HR of 1.65 for women diagnosed at ≥50 years. The estimated lifetime risks were 25% for breast cancer and 6% for ovarian cancer. Evidence of pathogenicity was also supported by the presence of the variant allele in two patients with Fanconi anaemia.Conclusions: Our results indicate that BRCA2 c.8351G>Ap.(Arg2784Gln) has a disease-causing effect, with reduced penetrance, similar to other pathogenic variants in moderate risk breast cancer genes such as ATM and CHEK2. We also provide risk-adapted recommendations for clinical management. Importantly, one should be aware of a reduced penetrance as the underlying reason for conflicting results among pieces of evidence used for variant classification.
AB - Background: The BRCA2 c.8351G>Ap.(Arg2784Gln) variant has long been classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) due to conflicting evidence used in variant classification. This study aims to clarify its pathogenicity and associated risks for breast and ovarian cancer.Methods: This study was conducted by the international Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles consortium. We collected data from 29 informative families with this variant. Co-segregation likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated using the full-likelihood method to assess pathogenicity, and cancer risks were estimated with modified segregation analysis.Results: Co-segregation analysis using a grid search across scaled penetrance levels for BRCA2 truncating variants yielded the strongest evidence in favour of pathogenicity, with LR maximised at approximately 20% of full penetrance (LR=11.026). Furthermore, estimated breast cancer risks were markedly higher for early onset breast cancer; women diagnosed at <50 years had a HR of 4.5, compared with a HR of 1.65 for women diagnosed at ≥50 years. The estimated lifetime risks were 25% for breast cancer and 6% for ovarian cancer. Evidence of pathogenicity was also supported by the presence of the variant allele in two patients with Fanconi anaemia.Conclusions: Our results indicate that BRCA2 c.8351G>Ap.(Arg2784Gln) has a disease-causing effect, with reduced penetrance, similar to other pathogenic variants in moderate risk breast cancer genes such as ATM and CHEK2. We also provide risk-adapted recommendations for clinical management. Importantly, one should be aware of a reduced penetrance as the underlying reason for conflicting results among pieces of evidence used for variant classification.
KW - Disease Management
KW - Genetic Variation
KW - Genetics, Medical
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105026670372
U2 - 10.1136/jmg-2025-111145
DO - 10.1136/jmg-2025-111145
M3 - Article
C2 - 41412794
AN - SCOPUS:105026670372
SN - 0022-2593
VL - 63
SP - 157
EP - 163
JO - Journal of Medical Genetics
JF - Journal of Medical Genetics
IS - 3
ER -