Examining the construct and known-group validity of a composite endpoint for The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum Data Set (TOPICS-MDS); A large-scale data sharing initiative

Cynthia S. Hofman*, Jennifer E. Lutomski, Han Boter, Bianca M. Buurman, Anton J. M. de Craen, Rogier Donders, Marcel G. M. Olde Rikkert, Peter Makai, Rene A. J. F. Melis, TOPICS-MDS Res Consortium

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    13 Citations (Scopus)
    261 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background

    Preference-weighted multi-faceted endpoints have the potential to facilitate comparative effectiveness research that incorporates patient preferences. The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey-Composite endpoint (TOPICS-CEP) is potentially a valuable outcome measure for evaluating interventions in geriatric care as it combines multiple outcomes relevant to older persons in a single metric. The objective of this study was to validate TOPICS-CEP across different study settings (general population, primary care and hospital).

    Methods

    Data were extracted from TOPICS Minimum Dataset (MDS), a pooled public-access national database with information on older persons throughout the Netherlands. Data of 17,603 older persons were used. Meta-correlations were performed between TOPICS-CEP indexed scores, EuroQol5-D utility scores and Cantril's ladder life satisfaction scores. Mixed linear regression analyses were performed to compare TOPICS-CEP indexed scores between known groups, e.g. persons with versus without depression.

    Results

    In the complete sample and when stratified by study setting TOPICS-CEP and Cantril's ladder were moderately correlated, whereas TOPICS-CEP and EQ-5D were highly correlated. Higher mean TOPICS-CEP scores were found in persons who were: married, lived independently and had an education at university level. Moreover, higher mean TOPICS-CEP scores were found in persons without dementia, depression, and dizziness with falls, respectively. Similar results were found when stratified by subgroup.

    Conclusion

    This study supports that TOPICS-CEP is a robust measure which can potentially be used in broad settings to identify the effect of intervention or of prevention in elderly care.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere0173081
    Number of pages12
    JournalPLoS ONE
    Volume12
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15-Mar-2017

    Keywords

    • QUALITY-OF-LIFE
    • HEALTH-STATUS
    • PATIENT GROUPS
    • CARE
    • ADULTS

    Cite this