Exchanging ideas

M Bevir; F Ankersmit

Exchanging ideas

M Bevir^*
, F Ankersmit

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this debate Mark Bevir and Frank Ankersmit continue their discussion of Bevir's The Logic of the History of Ideas. There are two related areas of contention: 1) the notion of intention and its use for a correct understanding of the writing of the history of ideas and 2) the question how deep the (ontological and/or epistemological) gap runs separating us from the past.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	351-372
Number of pages	22
Journal	Rethinking History
Volume	4
Issue number	3
Publication status	Published - 2000

Keywords

meaning
intention
the history of ideas
the past's strangeness
Davidson (Donald)
charity principle

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{76e2faf0658c44cf995eac36f5693350,

title = "Exchanging ideas",

abstract = "In this debate Mark Bevir and Frank Ankersmit continue their discussion of Bevir's The Logic of the History of Ideas. There are two related areas of contention: 1) the notion of intention and its use for a correct understanding of the writing of the history of ideas and 2) the question how deep the (ontological and/or epistemological) gap runs separating us from the past.",

keywords = "meaning, intention, the history of ideas, the past's strangeness, Davidson (Donald), charity principle",

author = "M Bevir and F Ankersmit",

year = "2000",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

pages = "351--372",

journal = "Rethinking History",

issn = "1364-2529",

publisher = "ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR \& FRANCIS LTD",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exchanging ideas

AU - Bevir, M

AU - Ankersmit, F

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - In this debate Mark Bevir and Frank Ankersmit continue their discussion of Bevir's The Logic of the History of Ideas. There are two related areas of contention: 1) the notion of intention and its use for a correct understanding of the writing of the history of ideas and 2) the question how deep the (ontological and/or epistemological) gap runs separating us from the past.

AB - In this debate Mark Bevir and Frank Ankersmit continue their discussion of Bevir's The Logic of the History of Ideas. There are two related areas of contention: 1) the notion of intention and its use for a correct understanding of the writing of the history of ideas and 2) the question how deep the (ontological and/or epistemological) gap runs separating us from the past.

KW - meaning

KW - intention

KW - the history of ideas

KW - the past's strangeness

KW - Davidson (Donald)

KW - charity principle

M3 - Article

SN - 1364-2529

VL - 4

SP - 351

EP - 372

JO - Rethinking History

JF - Rethinking History

IS - 3

ER -

Exchanging ideas

Abstract

Keywords

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Cite this