TY - JOUR
T1 - Executive Functions, Physical Abilities, and Their Relationship with Tactical Performance in Young Soccer Players
AU - Carnevale, Daniel
AU - Elferink-Gemser, Marije
AU - Filgueiras, Alberto
AU - Huijgen, Barbara
AU - Andrade, Caique
AU - Castellano, Julia
AU - SiIva, Davi
AU - Vasconcellos, Fabrício
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was funded by the Federal Government through Act of Incentive to Sports, Fundaçãzo Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPQ), Post-Graduate and Research Sub-Rectory (SR-2) and Post-Graduate Program in Exercise and Sport Sciences of Rio de Janeiro State University, Brazil. This study was financed in part by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - While tactical performance in soccer is associated with the players’ and teams’ collective actions in the context of game stimuli, how tactical performance relates to players’ executive functions (EFs) and physical abilities should be examined. In this study, we examined these relationships among 81 Under-15 male soccer players who underwent tactical evaluation (FUT-SAT), EF tests (i.e.,(Stop-Signal Test and Design Fluency Test)), and physical tests (i.e.,(Maturity Offset, Yoyo Endurance Test II, Sargent Jump Test, and Sprint Test)). Multiple linear regression modeling with the stepwise method showed that approximately 48% of overall game tactical performance variance was explained by inhibitory control, biological maturation, and sprint capacity (p =.004; d =.54; r2 =.479), whereas 35% of offensive tactical performance variance was explained by the same dimensions (p =.001; d =.91; r2 =.353). In addition, approximately 28% of defensive tactical performance variance was explained by cognitive flexibility and aerobic resistance (p =.007; d =.39; r2 =.280). These results reflect the combined importance of EFs and physical abilities for tactical performance in young soccer players, suggesting that these abilities may be targets for training when trying to improve young players’ performance.
AB - While tactical performance in soccer is associated with the players’ and teams’ collective actions in the context of game stimuli, how tactical performance relates to players’ executive functions (EFs) and physical abilities should be examined. In this study, we examined these relationships among 81 Under-15 male soccer players who underwent tactical evaluation (FUT-SAT), EF tests (i.e.,(Stop-Signal Test and Design Fluency Test)), and physical tests (i.e.,(Maturity Offset, Yoyo Endurance Test II, Sargent Jump Test, and Sprint Test)). Multiple linear regression modeling with the stepwise method showed that approximately 48% of overall game tactical performance variance was explained by inhibitory control, biological maturation, and sprint capacity (p =.004; d =.54; r2 =.479), whereas 35% of offensive tactical performance variance was explained by the same dimensions (p =.001; d =.91; r2 =.353). In addition, approximately 28% of defensive tactical performance variance was explained by cognitive flexibility and aerobic resistance (p =.007; d =.39; r2 =.280). These results reflect the combined importance of EFs and physical abilities for tactical performance in young soccer players, suggesting that these abilities may be targets for training when trying to improve young players’ performance.
KW - biological maturation
KW - cognition
KW - motor profile
KW - sports
KW - talent development
KW - youth
U2 - 10.1177/00315125221112236
DO - 10.1177/00315125221112236
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85133843823
SN - 0031-5125
VL - 129
SP - 1477
EP - 1491
JO - Perceptual and Motor Skills
JF - Perceptual and Motor Skills
IS - 5
ER -