Experimental evidence for a dual pathway model analysis of coping with the climate crisis

Martijn van Zomeren*, Russell Spears, Colinn Wayne Leach

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

165 Citations (Scopus)
1405 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Two experiments examined the psychological power of fear and group efficacy beliefs to increase environmental action intentions against the climate crisis Extending a dual pathway model of coping with collective disadvantage results showed evidence for emotion-focused approach coping Environmental action intentions were increased by individuals manipulated fear of the negative future consequences of the climate crisis (Experiments 1-2) Additionally results showed evidence for problem-focused approach coping Individuals measured (Experiment 1) and manipulated group efficacy beliefs (Experiment 2) increased environmental action intentions The results thus suggest that the dual pathway model can be successfully applied to a psychological analysis of emotion- and problem-focused approach coping with the climate crisis We discuss the theoretical and practical Implications of these results (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)339-346
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Environmental Psychology
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec-2010

Keywords

  • Fear
  • Group efficacy
  • Environmental action
  • Coping
  • Collective action
  • RELATIVE DEPRIVATION
  • COLLECTIVE ACTION
  • RESOURCE MOBILIZATION
  • EMOTIONAL APPROACH
  • PLANNED BEHAVIOR
  • SOCIAL IDENTITY
  • MEMBERSHIP
  • EFFICACY
  • COPE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Experimental evidence for a dual pathway model analysis of coping with the climate crisis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this