Fake indexicals in Dutch: A counterexample to Kratzer (2009)

Emar Maier; Kees de Schepper

doi:10.7358/snip-2013-027-maie

Fake indexicals in Dutch: A counterexample to Kratzer (2009)

Emar Maier^*, Kees de Schepper

^*Corresponding author for this work

Theoretical Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

72 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We argue that Dutch does not behave according to Kratzer’s theory of fake indexicality. The crucial observation is that Dutch allows English-style sloppy readings in non-agreeing only complements, but has a rich, German-style verbal and pronominal inflectional morphology.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	12-13
Number of pages	2
Journal	Snippets
Volume	2013
Issue number	27
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.7358/snip-2013-027-maie
Publication status	Published - Sept-2013

Access to Document

10.7358/snip-2013-027-maieLicence: Unspecified

Fake indexicals in Dutch A counterexample to Kratzer (2009)Final publisher's version, 194 KBLicence: Unspecified

http://www.ledonline.it/snippets/allegati/snippets27004.pdfLicence: Unspecified

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{947a25323a734f4fac3e9b60b90ae82e,

title = "Fake indexicals in Dutch: A counterexample to Kratzer (2009)",

abstract = "We argue that Dutch does not behave according to Kratzer{\textquoteright}s theory of fake indexicality. The crucial observation is that Dutch allows English-style sloppy readings in non-agreeing only complements, but has a rich, German-style verbal and pronominal inflectional morphology.",

author = "Emar Maier and {de Schepper}, Kees",

year = "2013",

month = sep,

doi = "10.7358/snip-2013-027-maie",

language = "English",

volume = "2013",

pages = "12--13",

journal = "Snippets",

number = "27",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fake indexicals in Dutch

T2 - A counterexample to Kratzer (2009)

AU - Maier, Emar

AU - de Schepper, Kees

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - We argue that Dutch does not behave according to Kratzer’s theory of fake indexicality. The crucial observation is that Dutch allows English-style sloppy readings in non-agreeing only complements, but has a rich, German-style verbal and pronominal inflectional morphology.

AB - We argue that Dutch does not behave according to Kratzer’s theory of fake indexicality. The crucial observation is that Dutch allows English-style sloppy readings in non-agreeing only complements, but has a rich, German-style verbal and pronominal inflectional morphology.

U2 - 10.7358/snip-2013-027-maie

DO - 10.7358/snip-2013-027-maie

M3 - Article

VL - 2013

SP - 12

EP - 13

JO - Snippets

JF - Snippets

IS - 27

ER -

Fake indexicals in Dutch: A counterexample to Kratzer (2009)

Abstract

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Cite this