Frequency and timing of adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines; A multi-country cohort event monitoring study

  • Monika Raethke
  • , Florence van Hunsel*
  • , Nicoletta Luxi
  • , Thomas Lieber
  • , Chiara Bellitto
  • , Erik Mulder
  • , Francesco Ciccimarra
  • , Fabio Riefolo
  • , Nicolas H. Thurin
  • , Debabrata Roy
  • , Kathryn Morton
  • , Felipe Villalobos
  • , Francisco Batel Marques
  • , Andreea Farcas
  • , Simona Sonderlichová
  • , Svetlana Belitser
  • , Olaf Klungel
  • , Gianluca Trifirò
  • , Miriam C. Sturkenboom
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    13 Citations (Scopus)
    109 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, EMA set-up a large-scale cohort event monitoring (CEM) system to estimate incidence rates of patient-reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of different COVID-19 vaccines across the participating countries. This study aims to give an up to date and in-depth analysis of the frequency of patient-reported ADRs after the 1st, 2nd, and booster vaccination, to identify potential predictors in developing ADRs and to describe time-to-onset (TTO) and time-to-recovery (TTR) of ADRs. Methods: A CEM study was rolled out in a period ranging from February 2021 to February 2023 across multiple European countries; The Netherlands, Belgium, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia and Spain. Analysis consisted of a descriptive analyses of frequencies of COVID-19 vaccine-related ADRs for 1st, 2nd and booster vaccination, analysis of potential predictors in developing ADRs with a generalized linear mixed-effects model, analysis of TTO and TTR of ADRs and a sensitivity analysis for loss to follow-up (L2FU). Results: A total of 29,837 participants completed at least the baseline and the first follow-up questionnaire for 1st and 2nd vaccination and 7,250 participants for the booster. The percentage of participants who reported at least one ADR is 74.32% (95%CI 73.82–74.81). Solicited ADRs, including injection site reactions, are very common across vaccination moments. Potential predictors for these reactions are the brand of vaccine used, the patient's age, sex and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. The percentage of serious ADRs in the study is low for 1st and 2nd vaccination (0.24%, 95%CI 0.19––0.31) and booster (0.26%, 95%CI 0.15, 0.41). The TTO was 14 h (median) for dose 1 and slightly longer for dose 2 and booster dose. TTR is generally also within a few days. The effect of L2FU on estimations of frequency is limited. Conclusion: Despite some limitations due to study design and study-roll out, CEM studies can allow prompt and almost real-time observations of the safety of medications directly from a patient-centered perspective, which can play a crucial role for regulatory bodies during an emergency setting such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2357-2369
    Number of pages13
    JournalVaccine
    Volume42
    Issue number9
    Early online date6-Mar-2024
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2-Apr-2024

    Keywords

    • Adverse drug reactions
    • Cohort event monitoring
    • COVID-19 vaccination
    • Pandemic
    • SARS-CoV-2 infection

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Frequency and timing of adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines; A multi-country cohort event monitoring study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this