Further evidence for cross-sample invariance of phobic factors: Psychiatric inpatient ratings on the fear survey schedule—III

Willem A. Arrindell*, Jan van der Ende

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    22 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Using two distinct methods of confirmatory analysis (factor invariance), phobic dimensions as measured by the Wolpe and Lang (1964) Fear Survey Schedule—III (“Social Fears”, “Agoraphobic Fears”, “Fears of Bodily Injury, Death and Illness”, “Fears of Sexual and Aggressive Scenes” and “Harmless Animals Fears”), identified in a previous study (Arrindell, 1980), were found to generalize from a non-institutionalized phobic (predominantly agoraphobic) sample to a heterogeneous psychiatric inpatient sample, irrespective of the method of analysis. Psychometric properties of the corresponding scales (inter-subscale correlations and reliability data) were encouraging and very similar to those obtained previously (Arrindell, 1980; Arrindell, Emmelkamp and van der Ende, 1984). The use of confirmatory techniques in determining the factorial validity of fear measures or their stability or generalizability across important S parameters is emphasized. It is argued that there is invariance of an Agoraphobic factor across multisamples and its importance is briefly pinpointed
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)289-297
    Number of pages9
    JournalBehaviour Research and Therapy
    Volume24
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1986

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Further evidence for cross-sample invariance of phobic factors: Psychiatric inpatient ratings on the fear survey schedule—III'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this