Gait six month and one-year after computer assisted Femur First THR vs. conventional THR. Results of a patient- and observer- blinded randomized controlled trial

Tim Weber*, Sebastian Dendorfer, Sjoerd K. Bulstra, Joachim Grifka, Gijsbertus J. Verkerke, Tobias Renkawitz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A prospective randomized controlled trial is presented that is used to compare gait performance between the computer assisted Femur First (CAS FF) operation method and conventional THR (CON). 60 patients underwent a 3D gait analysis of the lower extremity at pre-operative, 6 months post-operative and twelve months post-operative.

Detailed verification experiments were facilitated to ensure the quality of data as well as to avoid over-interpreting of the data. The results confirm a similar data-quality as reported in the literature. Walking speed, range of motion and symmetry thereof improved over the follow-up period, without significant differences between the groups. While all parameters do significantly increase over the follow-up period for both groups, there were no significant differences between them at any given time-point. Patients undergoing CAS FF showed a trend to improved hip flexion angle indicating a possible long-term benefit. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)418-425
Number of pages8
JournalGait & Posture
Volume49
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept-2016

Keywords

  • THA
  • Computer-assisted surgery
  • Femur first
  • Combined anteversion
  • Gait analysis
  • Biomechanics
  • TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY
  • REPLACEMENT
  • WALKING
  • DISLOCATION
  • CHILDREN
  • IMPINGEMENT
  • ORIENTATION
  • COMPONENTS
  • NAVIGATION
  • FRACTURES

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gait six month and one-year after computer assisted Femur First THR vs. conventional THR. Results of a patient- and observer- blinded randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this