Abstract
A prospective randomized controlled trial is presented that is used to compare gait performance between the computer assisted Femur First (CAS FF) operation method and conventional THR (CON). 60 patients underwent a 3D gait analysis of the lower extremity at pre-operative, 6 months post-operative and twelve months post-operative.
Detailed verification experiments were facilitated to ensure the quality of data as well as to avoid over-interpreting of the data. The results confirm a similar data-quality as reported in the literature. Walking speed, range of motion and symmetry thereof improved over the follow-up period, without significant differences between the groups. While all parameters do significantly increase over the follow-up period for both groups, there were no significant differences between them at any given time-point. Patients undergoing CAS FF showed a trend to improved hip flexion angle indicating a possible long-term benefit. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 418-425 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Gait & Posture |
| Volume | 49 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept-2016 |
Keywords
- THA
- Computer-assisted surgery
- Femur first
- Combined anteversion
- Gait analysis
- Biomechanics
- TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY
- REPLACEMENT
- WALKING
- DISLOCATION
- CHILDREN
- IMPINGEMENT
- ORIENTATION
- COMPONENTS
- NAVIGATION
- FRACTURES
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Gait six month and one-year after computer assisted Femur First THR vs. conventional THR. Results of a patient- and observer- blinded randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver