Global versus local arguments for scientific realism

Leah Henderson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There has been considerable recent discussion over whether the scientific realist should primarily take a local or a more global approach. A global approach is to argue for scientific realism as a general claim by taking account of the overall reliability of scientific method, as in the traditional No Miracles argument. An alternative is the local approach, which is to argue for the existence of particular entities case by case on the basis of the scientific evidence. For example, localists have suggested that the realist should argue for the existence of atoms using evidence such as that provided by Perrin’s early-20th-century experiments on Brownian motion. Considering this case leads to the conclusion that although localists can address some kinds of anti-realist concerns, there are certain anti-realist challenges which localists can only meet at the expense of weakening their own positive arguments.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism
EditorsJuha Saatsi
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter13
Pages151-163
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9780203712498
ISBN (Print)9781138888852, 9781351362917
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22-Nov-2017

Publication series

NameRoutledge Handbooks in Philosophy

Cite this