GMFM in Infancy: Age-Specific Limitations and Adaptations

Tjitske Hielkema, Elisa G. Hamer, Ilse Ebbers-Dekkers, Tineke Dirks, Carel G. B. Maathuis, Heleen A. Reinders-Messelink, Jan H. B. Geertzen, Mijna Hadders-Algra*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
527 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate longitudinal applicability of the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) in infants younger than 2 years. Methods: Twelve infants at very high risk for cerebral palsy were enrolled between 1 and 9 months corrected age. The children were assessed 4 times during 1 year with the GMFM-66, GMFM-88, and other neuromotor tests. Results: Longitudinal use of the GMFM in infancy was hampered by age and function-specific limitations. The GMFM-66 differentiated less at lower-ability levels than at higher-ability levels. The GMFM-88 demonstrated flattening of the developmental curve when infants had developed more motor abilities. We formulated adaptations for the longitudinal use of GMFM in infancy. Conclusions: To facilitate use of the GMFM in infancy, an adapted version may be an option. Further research is required to assess reliability and validity, and in particular, the sensitivity to change of the suggested adaptations. (Pediatr Phys Ther 2013;25:168-176)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)168-176
Number of pages9
JournalPediatric Physical Therapy
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1-Jul-2013

Keywords

  • cerebral palsy
  • child development
  • disability evaluation
  • infants
  • motor skills
  • movement
  • psychometrics
  • GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION
  • CEREBRAL-PALSY
  • PRETERM INFANTS
  • CHILDREN
  • VALIDATION
  • PROFILE
  • SUPINE
  • RISK

Cite this