Abstract
Purpose: We assessed the association between corrected contrast opacification (CCO) based on coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) and inducible ischemia by adenosine perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (APMR).
Methods: Sixty cardiac asymptomatic patients with extra-cardiac arterial disease (mean age 64.4 +/- 7.7 years; 78% male) underwent cCTA and APMR. Luminal CT attenuation values (Hounsfield Units) were measured in coronary arteries from proximal to distal, with additional measurements across sites with >50% lumen stenosis. CCO was calculated by dividing coronary CT attenuation by descending aorta CT attenuation. A reversible perfusion defect on APMR was considered as myocardial ischemia.
Results: In total, 169 coronary stenoses were found. Seven patients had 8 perfusion defects on APMR, with 11 stenoses in corresponding vessels. CCO decrease across stenoses with hemodynamic significance was 0.144 +/- 0.112 compared to 0.047 +/- 0.104 across stenoses without hemodynamic significance (P = 0.003). CCO decrease in lesions with and without anatomical stenosis was similar (0.054 +/- 0.116 versus 0.052 +/- 0.101; P = 0.89). Using 0.20 as preliminary CCO decrease cut-off, hemodynamic significance would be excluded in 82.9% of anatomical stenoses.
Conclusions: CCO decrease across coronary stenosis is associated with myocardial ischemia on APMR. CCO based on common cCTA data is a novel method to assess hemodynamic significance of anatomical stenosis. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 92-99 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | European Journal of Radiology |
| Volume | 84 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan-2015 |
Keywords
- Coronary artery disease
- Computed Tomography
- Contrast opacification
- Magnetic resonance imaging
- FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE
- COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY
- CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE
- ARTERY-DISEASE
- DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE
- MYOCARDIAL-ISCHEMIA
- GRADIENT
- METAANALYSIS
- PREVALENCE
- ACCURACY