TY - JOUR
T1 - High variation in roost use by Dunlin wintering in California: Implications for habitat limitation
AU - Conklin, Jesse R.
AU - Colwell, Mark A.
AU - Fox-Fernandez, Nancy W.
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Effective shorebird conservation requires a greater understanding of use and availability of high-tide roosts in coastal non-breeding areas. In this paper, we explore 1) variation in use of roosts; 2) landscape and environmental correlates of roost use; and 3) responses to predators and humans at roosts, to evaluate roost availability for a wintering population of Dunlin Calidris alpina pacifica at Humboldt Bay, CA, USA. For four winters (2002–2005), Dunlin use of particular
roosts was highly variable at the population and individual level, even at the most-used roosts.
In any given day, week, or month, most Dunlin roosts were unused, and we continued to record
new roosts even in the fourth year of study. Although roost use was influenced by landscape
attributes, time of day, and environmental conditions, these variables left most variation in roost
use unexplained. Dunlin departures from roosts were associated with the presence of avian
predators, but not with human activity. Collectively, these observations revealed no strong
evidence that roost availability was limited. This contrasts with findings of other studies, even
after considering differences in methodology and spatial scale of analysis. We discuss
implications for the interpretation of movement data, protection and/or creation of roosting
habitat, and assessment of roost quality.
AB - Effective shorebird conservation requires a greater understanding of use and availability of high-tide roosts in coastal non-breeding areas. In this paper, we explore 1) variation in use of roosts; 2) landscape and environmental correlates of roost use; and 3) responses to predators and humans at roosts, to evaluate roost availability for a wintering population of Dunlin Calidris alpina pacifica at Humboldt Bay, CA, USA. For four winters (2002–2005), Dunlin use of particular
roosts was highly variable at the population and individual level, even at the most-used roosts.
In any given day, week, or month, most Dunlin roosts were unused, and we continued to record
new roosts even in the fourth year of study. Although roost use was influenced by landscape
attributes, time of day, and environmental conditions, these variables left most variation in roost
use unexplained. Dunlin departures from roosts were associated with the presence of avian
predators, but not with human activity. Collectively, these observations revealed no strong
evidence that roost availability was limited. This contrasts with findings of other studies, even
after considering differences in methodology and spatial scale of analysis. We discuss
implications for the interpretation of movement data, protection and/or creation of roosting
habitat, and assessment of roost quality.
U2 - 10.1017/S0959270908000270
DO - 10.1017/S0959270908000270
M3 - Article
SN - 1474-0001
VL - 18
SP - 275
EP - 291
JO - Bird Conservation International
JF - Bird Conservation International
ER -